Skip to content

Free Essays Sexism And Language

Table of contents

1. Preface

2. Sexist language defined
2.1. Semantic derogation 5 2.2.Generic masculine
2.3. Feminine markers
2.4. Personal titles

3. Sexism in newspapers
3.1. Associated Press guidelines

4. Analysis of articles from The Washington Post

5. Conclusion

6. Works Cited

1. Preface

Women are more emotional than men, they speak in a different way than men, but how are they spoken about? Throughout the last century there has been a lot of discussion concerning language and gender. Mainly, linguists have focused on the different discourse strategies and conversational styles of women and men, that is, they dealt with the difference of women’s and men’s language. Sexism became an important point of discussion in the 1960s, and especially feminist critiques have discussed the sexist representation of women in language. Many linguists tried to find alternatives for features of language that discriminate against women, and thus sought to correct existing sex biases. In a time where the inequality of the sexes is said to have diminished, the anti-sexism movement seems to have decreased, as well. People try to speak in a politically correct way, a way that is not sexist or racist, but certain stereotypes are nevertheless still part of the language system.

This can be seen when taking a closer look at the media, which plays an important role in the process of language development. Newspapers articles, for example, have to be objective and without bias, but as they employ language that is politically correct with regard to common language usage, they reflect the language of a society. Consequently, the media is a rich source for analysis when it comes to examining to what extent sexism is still an issue today. Has the feminist fight against male supremacy been without effect?

In my paper, I will discuss if sexism in language has diminished and how it is dealt with. Therefore, I will first define sexist language and the relationship to society with the help of several linguistic approaches. As part of this, I will explain several features of sexist language, such as derogatory designations for women, the generic masculine, feminine markers, and the problem of personal titles. Then, I will depict the role of the media in context with sexist language. In relation to sexism in newspapers, I will list some rules established by the Associated Press that intend to help journalists deal with sexist features of language. Finally, I will analyze articles from The Washington Post to examine if sexist language is still perpetuated.

2. Sexist language defined

In order to discuss whether or not sexism in language has diminished since the first feminist attempts to correct sex biases in language, sexist language has to be defined first. The debate on language with regard to gender has focused on two different areas: the difference between female and male discourse strategies, and the naming and representation of women. The discussion of naming and representation is essentially concerned with women spoken about rather than women speaking. Many feminists have examined the representation of women in language and have, according to Deborah Cameron (1993), concluded “that our languages are sexist: that is they represent or ‘name’ the world from a masculine viewpoint and in accordance with stereotyped beliefs about the sexes” (Cameron 12). That is, language encodes a culture’s values, and in this way reflects sexist culture.

Language could be seen as a reflection of sexist culture; or [...] it could be seen as carrier of ideas and assumptions which become, through their constant re-enactment in discourse, so familiar and conventional we miss their significance. [...] Thus sexism is not merely reflected but acted out and thus reinforced in a thousand banal encounters (Cameron 12).

So one can say that sexist language can be defined as the use of words that cultivate stereotyped gender roles or customized gender assumptions.

Language hence carries an ideology created by the society that uses it. According to Cate Poynton (1989), a culture fixes its beliefs and attitudes towards certain issues through an ideology encoded in language. Ideology in this case is “another way of referring to the world view of a particular culture” (Poynton 17). She furthermore says that

[...] ideological meanings emerge out of particular power-configurations. But rather than being separable from the society that has produced them they mirror that society back to itself in such a way as to reinforce its own identity (Poynton 18).

In English-speaking cultures, the ideology encoded in English advocates subordinate places for women in society, as the ‘good woman’ is the wife and mother who supports and nurtures others, and women who aim to be successful outside the domestic sphere deviate from their preconceived gender roles. Poynton says that as long as this is the case, “sexism- the ideology of gender as the inferiorization [...] of women with respect to men- is alive” (Poynton 19).

2.1. Semantic derogation

Muriel Schulz, who discusses the naming of women in the course of language history, states that

[t]here is no doubt [...] that a language reflects thoughts, attitudes, and culture of those who make it and use it. [...] To this extent, at least, analysis of a language tells us a great deal about the interests, achievements, obsessions, hopes, fears, and prejudices of the people who created the language. Who are the people who created English? Largely men- at least until the present generation. [...] A woman’s life has been largely restricted to the home and family, while men have lived in a larger world [...]. That men are the primary creators and users of the English language generally follows from the primary role they have traditionally played in English-speaking cultures. [...] An analysis of the language used by men to discuss and describe women reveals something about male attitudes, fears, and prejudices concerning the female sex (Schulz 134).

Based on this statement, Schulz describes in her article “The semantic derogation of woman” (1975) how words designating women that were originally neutral in both meaning and sex reference take on negative sexual connotations in the course of language development, and after a period of time end as a “sexual slur”(Schulz 135). Thus, in contrast to Poynton who says that women are characterized according to their domestic role, Schulz says that men think of women mostly in sexual terms. In her opinion, men’s names for women reflect their sexual fears and attitudes concerning the female sex, and consequently terms for women often have negative sexual connotations. She shows that derogation tends to occur more often when naming women by giving examples of matched pairs of terms that designate females and males. Sir and Master, for example, did not acquire derogatory meanings while Madam, Miss, and Mistress have all derogated and became euphemisms respectively for “a mistress of a brothel”, “a prostitute”, and “a woman with whom a man eventually fornicates” (cf. Schulz 136). The connotations of these titles show the frequent course of terms designating women as they “slip past respectable women and settle upon prostitutes and mistresses” (Schulz 136). Furthermore, niece became an euphemism for “a priest’s illegitimate daughter or concubine” (Schulz 136), but there is no corresponding term for nephew. Even girl itself has a history of pejoration. First, the term applied to “a child of either sex” to be then specialized to “a female child”. After that, it designated “a maidservant” and eventually acquired the meanings “a prostitute”, “a mistress”, or “the female sex- or that part of it given to unchastity”. Today, the term has rehabilitated and is used again for “a female child” (cf. Schulz 138).

An explanation as to why terms designating women degenerate, Schulz examines the origins of pejoration with reference to three suggestions made by Stephen Ullman (1967). The first is the contaminating concept, which describes how the terms woman, female, and lady are reduced to having purely sexual meanings. Woman, for example, was avoided in the 18th century as it had became to mean “paramour or mistress” or “the sense of intercourse with women when used in plural as in ‘ Wine, Women, and Song ’” (Schulz 142). It was replaced by female, but this term also came to be considered “degrading and indelicate” (Schulz 142). In the 19th century, female was replaced by lady, which, however, vulgarized as well, and was again substituted by the rehabilitated term woman. The second possibility of explanation is the frequent use of euphemisms such as “women of the night” caused by a “reluctance to name the profession outright” (Schulz 143). Schulz says that this is not a likely explanation as most of the euphemisms are rather dysphemistic. She considers the third explanation, prejudice, to be the most likely source of derogatory terms. Prejudice, she thus concludes, is

fear, based on a supposed threat to the power of the male. [...] Power becomes a question because the male is biologically inferior to the female in several respects. [...M]an’s fear of woman is basically sexual, which is perhaps the reason why so many of the derogatory terms for women take on sexual connotations (Cameron 143 f.).

2.2. Generic masculine

The generic masculine, another feature of sexist language, has a long history, as well. Generic masculine means that the masculine personal pronoun forms and the word man, alone or as a compound, are supposed to refer to people of both sexes when the sex of the referent is not known or does not matter. Numerous psycholinguistic studies agree that the generic masculine does not actually work; sentences with masculine forms, which by the dictates of prescriptive grammar ought to have generic reference are usually taken to refer to men to the exclusion of women (Fasold 116).

[...]

Sexism In Language Essay

(Rationale)Several words in the English language, in fact all languages, have distinct connotations for the different sexes whether positive or negative, of which the negative normally refer to the female or homosexual male counterpart, suggesting their inferiority to the "MAN".

What is sexism in language, you may ask?"Sexism in language is the use of language which devalues members of one sex, most invariably women and thus fosters gender inequality. It discriminates against women by rendering them invisible or trivializing them at the same time that it perpetuates notions of male supremacy" (taken from: http://www.upou.org/gender/gender_fair.htm ).

The degradation of women (and men) through even our word usage had an impact on our visions of society and the values and ethnic meanings that are set. These ideals put in place, influence our children who are submitted to the biases and discriminatory characteristics of the languages, to the point that we no longer realize when our statements are not gender neutral.

For example, the meaning of the word 'man', which was representative of both sexes, has been narrowed to separate the two, rendering the English language more gender specific. This sexual stereotype is seen throughout languages, especially with the names given to certain careers which imply that they are only suitable for the 'professional male', for example, congressman, or merely appropriate for the low paid insignificant other (female or male), housemaid.

I have chosen to study this topic because of its growing concern in society, as more persons have realized its offensive presence and importance and try to use more gender neutral language.

Though mention is made of homosexuals, this project is intended to focus mainly on the female aspect of sexism in language, not intending to be biased toward other individual groups in society.

LITERATURE REVIEWLanguage normally uses male pronouns automatically whenever the gender of a person is unknown. For example, "Every child must obey his parents." This use of language is sexist and shows how women are habitually linguistically invisible, being hidden behind the more frequently used 'he', 'him', or 'his,' constantly suggesting male dominance and supremacy.

This is of course not the only occurrence when we falter in noticing the absence of the due gratification of women. In non-gender specific terms like lawyer and judge, images of a strong male figure are brought to mind.

Also with words such as aggressive, if used to describe the behaviour of a woman, it is thought to be unbecoming, for "a lady should be seen and not heard". Whereas, for a man, he is duly considered to be an aspirer. Even one of our present day politicians, Senator Barack Obama, has been accused of his language use from the following statement;Quote,"You challenge the status quo and suddenly the claws come out"End quote.

His use of the word 'claws', clearly shows his...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

Gender And Language Essay

796 words - 3 pages Sexism in language is the use of gender-specific words which are thought to be discriminatory against women, and the use of expressions which encourage stereotypical images of men and women.The Merriam-Webster Dictionary...

Gender And Language Essay

796 words - 3 pages Sexism in language is the use of gender-specific words which are thought to be discriminatory against women, and the use of expressions which encourage stereotypical images of men and women.The Merriam-Webster Dictionary...

Sexism

790 words - 3 pages What is sexism? Why did it happen in our society? Why dose sexism consider as a social problem? And how should we solve such problem... There are so many questions are being asked about sexism. Men and women are two very distinct creatures; they have so many things in difference, such as the biological, psychological, and physical. Yet men and women are created equal by nature. Even though men and women are born equally, one thing that is very...

Movies Control: Sex and Violence

1716 words - 7 pages Nowadays, the media has a greater influence than ever on what the public believes and accepts. Research shows that the amount and realism of violence and sex in movies has skyrocketed, influencing the views of our generation. However, little to no attention is placed on the effects of movies on our views of racism, sexism, classism, and heteronormativity. Before watching a movie, you can get a general idea of how much sex and violence it will...

Is it really necessary to use gender-neutral language? A short essay discussing the importance of non-sexist language.

550 words - 2 pages Is it really necessary to use gender-neutral language?It is very important to use non-sexist language, even if a person does not have any discriminative intentions at all. Everyone, consciously or not, tends to assign masculine gender to terms, such as...

Comparison of One is Not Born a Woman by Wittig and The Second Sex Simone De Beauvoir

984 words - 4 pages The construction of gender is based on the division of humanity to man and woman. This is impossible ontologically speaking; because the humans are not divided, thus gender is merely an imaginary realm. It only exist in the language exercises, and the way that cultural products are conceived in them. This essay is a preliminary attempt to offer an analysis of ‘One Is Not Born a Woman’ by Wittig and ‘The Second Sex’ by Simone De Beauvoir holds on...

Sexist Lexicon – Can It Be Changed?

2164 words - 9 pages Most societies have been patriarchal historically, and the feminist movement has only occurred relatively recently. There cannot be ideological equality while there is still a stigma to being born differently, or of the “inferior sex.” People make assumptions on others based entirely on their sex, such as females are supposed to be nurturing and weak while males are supposed to be dominant and strong. The vernacular language use implies a sexist...

Alleen Pace Nilsen's View of Sexism in English

1071 words - 4 pages Alleen Pace Nilsen's View of Sexism in English Alleen Pace Nilsen began a study of Sexism in American English after returning from a two-year stay in Kabul, Afghanistan. Trying to avoid social issues in her research, Nilsen used the dictionary, as her main source and guide, making note-cards on every entry that seemed to tell something about male and female. She soon discovered that language and society go hand and hand. Furthermore,...

Gender Bias in Language

1233 words - 5 pages As a society evolves and changes, its language mutates and conforms to changing needs. Words form to define new things, archaic terms drop from use, and meanings change as different usages develop. The English language is grammatically neutral in classifying objects by sex. It is unusual among Indo-European languages in that it does not impose gender on inanimate objects. One might think that freedom from arbitrarily enforced gender would...

Comparison and Contrast between Sexes for Dominance

1245 words - 5 pages Comparison and Contrast Between Our Sexes: Why Do We Recognize Men as the Dominant Sex In Our Species? It has always been, within the course of human history, that only men were treated with respect and recognition, while women stayed at home and took care of the household. When people define the following careers such as, policeman, fireman, chairman, mailman, etc., we assume that those people are male because we were taught to feel this way...

Christian Beliefs on Discrimination and Prejudice

1921 words - 8 pages Christian Beliefs on Discrimination and Prejudice Most Christians agree that discrimination and prejudice are wrong. Both the Roman Catholic Church and the Church of England have similar views on racism but slightly differing views on sexism and women in the church. Text Box: Racism /’reısı(ə)m/ n. 1 a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities. And that racial difference produces an...