Skip to content

Action Research Introduction Format Essay

Sample action research sample | sample action research format (IT FIELD)

Title Page

Table of Contents

List of Figures and Tables

Action Research Project Overview

The non-portfolio or non-internship action research project involves actively researching a current technological problem or issue.  The problem or issue can be internal or external to a business; however, the research requires fieldwork.  This project’s duration must be at least eight weeks (four, two-week iterations of at least 40 hours of activity per iteration).

Introduction Overview

The introduction, as the minimum, is one to two pages long and should not have an APA heading.  The introduction must include:

  • A brief history/background of the business if the problem involves a business or the background support for your technological problem or issue if the problem does not involve a business
  • A discussion about the circumstances of the situation that you plan to improve or change
    • You may want to discuss, ‘what is wrong or deficient…and why you think making changes will result in improvements.  Include why the improvement is of value to you (the stakeholder)
  • Refer to the assignment on Blackboard for additional assignment criteria


The methodology section of the paper, as a minimum, is two to three pages long.  Essentially, this section is a mini-research paper defining and explaining the Action Research (AR) Methodology including its application to technology research.

The methodology paper must include:

  • Five (5) professional (subject matter experts) or scholarly references
  • A discussion about the history of AR and application/uses along with its applicability to researching technology issues
  • A transitional paragraph at the end of the section describing how AR is an appropriate methodology for the research you are doing
  • Refer to the assignment on Blackboard for additional assignment criteria

Literature Review

A literature review is a research paper about your topic. This section, as the minimum, is three to four pages long using a themed (topic sections) presentation approach with as much detail as possible.  Depending on your topic, specific examples or literary support may be difficult to find.  You may need to use a surrogate (somewhat related) topic in order to complete the literature review.  For example, improving the ‘needs assessment’ process in organization XYZ may not yield research results, so you will need to generalize the topic.  Generalizing the topic could may require examining research on the value of need assessments, the processes associated with needs assessment, or how to a conduct needs assessment.

The literature review section/paper must include:

  • At least eight (8) professional (subject matter expert) and/or scholarly references
  • Refer to the assignment on Blackboard for additional assignment criteria


The proposal section contains a high-level overview of your project as laid out in a minimum of four iterations.  Each iteration should represent approximately two weeks, with a minimum of 40 hours of activity in each iteration. Do not try to layout your full plan at this point, keep this to one or two paragraphs for each iteration description.  At this point, you should focus on the big picture. Hypothetical situation…Let’s say your proposal deals with improving the ‘needs assessment’ process in organization XYZ.  You know the process is weak and requires improvement, but do not know what the weak points are or how to correct them.  You assume you will need the following iterations:

Iteration 1

In iteration 1, you anticipate two or three brainstorming sessions with representatives from each of the three divisions with each session last a maximum of two hours.  The session discussions will include identifying current process flow, a gap analysis, gathering process requirements, and communication flow.  In addition, the iteration will include compiling, analyzing, and reporting the results of each brainstorming session.  At this point you can go into a little more detail but not too much…keep this statement to one or two paragraphs.

Remember, this is an example and one meeting is not sufficient for an iteration.

Iteration 2

You expect there will be several one-hour follow up session with each of the division representatives to discuss the outcome of the brainstorming session, clarify information, and gather more detail about their division’s requirements.  Again keep this to one or two paragraphs, I encourage you to focus on the big picture.

Remember, this is an example and one meeting is not sufficient for an iteration.

Iteration 3

This iteration will be a two-hour follow-up meeting with the three division representatives to discuss identified common requirements, possible integration of requirements, and discussion of how unique requirements will be managed at the division level.  The researcher will manage common and integrated requirements, and the appropriate division must manage unique requirements.  At the conclusion of this meeting, the division representatives will be tasked with formulating a solution for all unique requirements. 

Remember, this is an example and one meeting is not sufficient for an iteration.

Iteration 4

You need to fully analyze the feedback concerning the requirements from each of the divisions.  Then, document a final process to collect ‘needs’ from each of the divisions,

Remember, this is an example and one meeting is not sufficient for an iteration.


A figure, see Figure below, showing at least four iterations of your Action Research project’s flow must appear at the end of your proposal.  The figure shown here should be used as a template for the information needed in the figure.  Remember to revise the information in each of the Iteration number blocks!

Reflective Statement

The last component of your action research paper is a reflective learning statement encompassing your complete experience.  The statement must present two aspects of your research.  First, the statement must summarize your experiences during the process and, second, the statement must summarize your overall learning during the process.  Be sure to include any specific achievements.



by Sharon Parsons
San Jose State University


Traditional educational research has limited usefulness for classroom teachers. It often requires the carrying out of specific research projects to the exclusion of their teaching. When educators talk about teacher research, or teaching as research they envision teachers extending their role to include critical reflection upon their teaching. Some examples of teaching as research include educators who wish to undertake research in their classrooms or schools for the purpose of improving teaching, to test educational theory, or to evaluate and implement an educational plan. Teacher researchers have adopted the label "action research " to describe their particular approach to classroom research.

Kurt Lewin (1946) has been credited with the development of the idea of action research. The evolution of an action research agenda within education has been influenced by people such as Kemmis (1983), Ebbutt (1985), Elliott (1991), Hopkins (1985) and others. Hopkins (1985:pp 58-60) offers good advice on teacher research when he advocates the development of teacher's professional expertise and judgment. He provides a basis for the selection of classroom research by teachers:

  • the teacher's primary role is to teach and any research project must not interfere with or disrupt this commitment;

  • the method of data collection should not be too demanding on the teacher's time;

  • the methodology used must be reliable enough to allow teachers to formulate hypotheses confidently and develop strategies applicable to the classroom situation;

  • the teacher should be committed to the research problem under study;

  • teachers must follow ethical procedures when carrying out research; and

  • classroom research where possible should adopt a perspective where all members of a school community build and share a common vision.

Often the hardest part in classroom research is deciding on a focus. Teacher research does not require a precise hypothesis. In fact you do not have to begin with a problem. Hopkins (1985:pg 63) suggests that " All you need is a general idea that something should be improved. Your general idea may stem from a promising new idea or the recognition that existing practice falls short of aspiration." Once the focus of the research has been decided, planning for data collection, followed by actual data collection and analysis occurs.

How to Get Started on a Project

Borrowing heavily from Hollingsworth (1994) and Hopkins (1985) I offer the following practical suggestions for the teacher research process:
  1. Decide on a focus
    • Start with autobiographical data by locating your best professional self. Some questions you might ask - What are your broad interests in teaching and learning? What are your specific interests? What are manageable questions? Choose something you feel passionate about.

    • Justify that the project is your best solution to the problem.

  2. Develop a plan to gain insights
    • Develop a time-line to gather evidence or data to examine what you are trying to accomplish/resolve/do in light of "what you do not know yet".

    • Decide what evidence you want to collect. Evidence includes such things as questionnaires/surveys, observations (video or written notes), collaborations ( i.e. video or audio tape of meetings, peer coaching) interviews, tests and records, student work, video and audio tape transcripts, personal journal, library readings, etc.

  3. Analyze the data by looking for patterns, or themes across the evidence
    • keep logs and journals, periodically read over the evidence, code data from themes and patterns, draw or chart patterns, try to summarize what you have learned as you go, by noting images, metaphors, and any new questions.

    • check out your understandings by triangulating evidence (same theme, code, pattern appears in more than two types of data), and by talking to peers, students, friends.

  4. Report on what you have learned
    • to your colleagues, to parents, at conferences, in journals.

    • summarize what you learned -- in an essay, narrative, poster, video, . . . poetry.

    • tell how the problem changed, didn't change, or became worse because of changes in your practice.

A key component of Action Research is sharing what you have learned. A number of techniques ranging from videos to formal presentations have already been suggested, but consider the following as potential audiences as well:

  1. Colleagues at a staff development day
  2. Parents and students
  3. Email discussion groups (see On-line Resources)
  4. Publications from professional organizations
  5. Journals such as "Teacher Research: The Journal of Classroom Inquiry" - a journal by teachers, for teachers. Brenda Power
Once teacher research is shared it allows for further action on the part of the teacher, or the broader educational community to continue. The educational community has become increasing supportive of teacher research. At a recent meeting on science education in California that I attended Bob Polkinghorn, the Director of the Statewide Subject Matter Projects in California called for the documentation of evidence of change in practice at the classroom level by teachers. If you have not undertaken teacher research in your classroom now is the time to try!

Ownership Concerns

When two or more teachers are working together perhaps in partnership with a university researcher, the issues of ownership of data gathered in a school context, publication authorship, meeting presentation responsibilities, and obtaining approval for case studies are best discussed early on. A clear understanding of who has the final say about what happens in the classroom should be established. Teachers need to be supported as researchers, but their experiences, their students and district documents may also need protecting. For instance, it may be difficult to hear "outside" collaborators talk or write about you and/or your classroom, particularly if they retain authorship of the paper. Even more complications arise if royalties are involved.

Examples of Action Research

The science standards have become a focus of reform for many science teachers. Teachers who want to bring about such systemic reform in science teaching are now engaging in research into their own practice and sharing the outcomes with others. Two illustrations of on-going teacher research projects where teachers are engaged in exploring ways to increase inquiry based science instruction in the classroom come from CSP-SENA (California Science Project - Science Education Network Academy):
  • Merle Boxill (Chemistry) and Sandy Waston (Biology) at Andrew Hill High School, San Jose are exploring how to introduce open-ended inquiry science into their teaching.

  • Norma Rodriquez at San Antonio Elementary School, San Jose is exploring ways to increase inquiry based science instruction at her school site for all students (not just her own class).

  • Carolyn Csongradi at Burlingame High School, Burlingame has explored how to involve more writing and female participation in her chemistry classes

Such grass roots efforts are what are needed to bring about systemic reform in science education.

On-line Resources

  1. The number of educators involved in Action Research/Teacher Research Email Discussion Groups is growing rapidly. A site you might want to visit to get an overview of the kind of activity associated with teacher research is located here.
  1. One on-going teacher research group
  1. California Science Education Groups involved/interested in Action Research:

About the Author
Online Resources
Discuss Teacher Research
Return to Let's Collaborate

Teaching & Learning Index

Let's Collaborate Index